The Book Claim
The reported event occurred on April 7, 2025. A newly published book alleges that former President Donald Trump privately lashed out at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a tense telephone conversation in September 2025. The report, authored by New York Times journalists Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan, details an exchange where the former president reportedly pushed a comprehensive 20-point plan intended to end the war in Gaza.
According to the account, frustration escalated rapidly during the call, which involved Kushner and White House envoy Steve Witkoff. The book states that Trump told Netanyahu: “Everybody’s sick of you, Bibi.” He then reportedly added: “All the Jews are sick of you,” before concluding with the specific line: “Even the two Jews on this call are sick of you,” referring directly to Kushner and Witkoff.
The Alleged Exchange
This alleged comment marks a sharp departure from Trump’s long-standing public posture. For years, he has positioned himself as one of Israel’s strongest defenders, often using pro-Israel politics to define his foreign policy identity. He has recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and taken hard lines against Iran.
The reported language cuts against that image by suggesting a private fury that contradicted the public show of unity. The report also says Kushner later told an ally he was “out,” describing the Israelis as “crazy.” Meanwhile, Trump allegedly warned Netanyahu not to walk away from the proposed agreement.
A Departure from Public Posture
The timing of the alleged remarks is critical. It took place during sensitive peace negotiations after an Israeli strike in Qatar caused major regional anger. Qatar was playing a central role as a mediator involving Hamas, Israel and the United States at the time.
The book claims Trump saw Netanyahu not only as a partner but as an obstacle who risked derailing the deal he wanted to claim as a diplomatic victory.
The Timing and Context
The book claims this exchange happened during private negotiations in September 2025 as Trump pushed his plan aimed at ending the war in Gaza. That distinction matters because this is not a fresh public comment from Trump. It is a claim from a newly published book about what was allegedly said during private talks months earlier.
Because of that, the key wording is “reportedly” and “the book claims.” The reported exchange happened as Trump administration officials Jared Kushner and White House envoy Steve Witkoff pushed for a deal aimed at ending the Gaza war, securing the release of remaining hostages taken during the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack, and gaining support from Arab countries for Gaza’s redevelopment.
Internal U.S. Tensions
The book suggests that personal frustration broke through even the strongest political alignment when interests collided. It shows that U.S. support for Israel is not only ideological but also transactional. The reported wording adds another layer of controversy because it allegedly referred to Jewish frustration with Netanyahu while speaking in front of Kushner and Witkoff.
The issue here is political leadership, not religion or identity. Criticism of the Israeli government is distinct from criticism of Jewish people. The reported anger was aimed at Netanyahu’s decisions, his conduct and his handling of the negotiations according to the book account.
The Clash of Interests
The Gaza war placed enormous pressure on the United States. Images of devastation, mass civilian death, displacement and hunger created growing anger across the world. Arab and Muslim leaders were under pressure from their populations. European governments faced similar scrutiny.
American Democrats were increasingly divided. Incentives to Push for a Deal. In that environment, Trump had an incentive to push for a deal.
A Clash of Goals
But Netanyahu faced his own political pressures inside Israel. He was under pressure from far-right coalition partners, security hardliners and a public deeply divided over the war and the hostages.
This created a clash where Trump wanted a deal while Netanyahu needed to protect his political survival.
The Gaza war placed enormous pressure on the United States.
European governments faced similar scrutiny. American Democrats were increasingly divided.
But Netanyahu’s calculations were not identical. Far-right ministers had repeatedly pushed for harder positions, making every negotiation more complicated.
The moment those pressures collided, even close allies reportedly clashed behind closed doors. The book’s claims remind the public that diplomatic relationships are often very different when leaders are out of the spotlight.
But private conversations can be far more aggressive when war, hostages and political survival are on the table. For Netanyahu, the reported call is damaging because it suggests he was being pressured hard by Trump while publicly presenting himself as a leader standing firm.
For Trump, the account reveals how quickly his loyalty to an ally can turn into anger when that ally gets in the way of his own dealmaking narrative. The relationship is not just about shared values; it is about control over the direction of the war and the timing of a deal.
It suggests that the peace push unfolded not as a smooth alliance but as a tense, pressured and volatile negotiation where even close allies were turning on each other behind closed doors. The message behind closed doors was reportedly very different from the one shown in public.
Trump was reportedly warning Netanyahu rather than simply praising him. He was reportedly furious with him. And he was reportedly telling him that even some of his strongest supporters had run out of patience.
That is a major claim based on the book account. It adds another layer to the story of how the Gaza peace push unfolded, highlighting the strain in the Trump-Netanyahu relationship beneath the public performance of loyalty.
Because of that, the key wording is “reportedly” and “the book claims.”